Legal Opinion

Jaffe v. Leatherman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 4, 1930No. 6 Div. 474PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The bill of exceptions sought to be established was stricken. 221 Ala. 178, 128 So. 449.

Under the law the defendant and his sureties on the replevin bond were duty bound to deliver the property in question within thirty days after rendition of the judgment in favor of the plaintiff on December 17, 1928. The trial court held that they had failed in that duty, and that plaintiff was entitled to recover of such obligors the alternative value of the property as fixed by the judgment of the court rendered on the foregoing date. We have no bill of exceptions to look to as to any controverted…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Quill v. Carolina Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Garrett v. CobbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Harrison v. HamnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  4. Jesse French Piano & Organ Co. v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  5. White v. MorringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Campbell v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. Jaffe v. LeathermanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Holcombe v. De SassietSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Thorn v. First Nat. Bank of OppAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Thorn v. First Nat. Bank of OppAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API