Legal Opinion

the Williamsburg Care Company, L.P. v. Jesusa Acosta

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 2015No. 13-0576PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The outcome of this case is controlled by our opinion in Fredericksburg Care Co. v. Perez, 461 S.W.3d 513, 2015 WL 1035343 (Tex.2015). Both cases, along with a third case styled Williamsburg Care Co. v. Acosta, 461 S.W.3d 530, 2015 WL 1029779 (Tex.2015) (per curiam), involve the question of whether a federal law, the McCar-ran-Ferguson Act (MFA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1011-1015, exempts Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 74.451 from being preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-16. The court of appeals consolidated this case with Perez and Acosta for oral argument, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fredericksburg Care Co. v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Fredericksburg Care Co. v. LiraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2013
  3. Williamsburg Care Co. v. AcostaTexas Supreme Court · 2015

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Specialty Select Care Center of San Antonio D/B/A Casa Rio Healthcare and Rehabilitation v. Adolfo R. Juiel, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2016
  2. Specialty Select Care Center of San Antonio LLC D/B/A Casa Rio Healthcare and Rehabilitation v. Jose Flores, as Next Friend of Julie Flores, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API