Legal Opinion

Dueber Watch-Case Manuf'g Co. v. E. Howard Watch & Clock Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 5, 1895PublishedCited by 13 opinions

This was an action by the Dueber Watch-Case Manufacturing Company against the E. Howard Watch & Clock Company and numerous other individuals and corporations, to recover damages alleged to have been caused to plaintiff’s business by the alleged unlawful acts and combinations of defendants.

Read the full summary

This was an action by the Dueber Watch-Case Manufacturing Company against the E. Howard Watch & Clock Company and numerous other individuals and corporations, to recover damages alleged to have been caused to plaintiff’s business by the alleged unlawful acts and combinations of defendants. The case was first heard in the circuit court upon the demurrer of the E. Howard Watch & Clock Company to the first amended complaint, and the demurrer was sustained, the opinion of the circuit court therein being reported in 55 Fed. 851. A demurrer was afterwards sustained to the second amended complaint,…

1Opinion of the Court

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The complainant corporation is a citizen of Ohio, the demurring defendant corporation a citizen of Massachusetts, engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling watch movements, and having a place of business in the city of New York, state of New York. Of the nineteen other defendants, ten are individuals whose citizenship is not set forth in the complaint. It is averred that they are engaged in business, two -of them in New York City under one firm name, two others in *639Philadelphia and üíew York City under another firm name, three others in the city oí New York…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. United States v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  4. Budd v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Oregon Steam Navigation Co. v. WinsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  2. State ex inf. Hadley v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Raymond Bros.-ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Sunbeam Corp. v. Payless Drug StoresDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
  5. In re GriceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Texas · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API