Legal Opinion

Q—Dot, Inc. v. Atlantic City Electric Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 24, 1981No. 1041PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the lower court erred in concluding that it had waived its right to file a mechanics’ lien. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the order of the court below striking appellant’s mechanics’ lien claim.

In early July, 1977, the parties entered into a “Continuing Agreement” for appellant to construct and/or maintain electrical generating stations owned and/or operated by appellees. Paragraph 1:02 of that contract provides:

It is the intent of the parties by entering into this agreement, to establish a general set of terms and conditions which will govern the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mar Ray, Inc. v. SchroederSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. John B. Kelly, Inc. v. Phoenix Plaza, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Bendik v. Uniontown S. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mele Construction Co. v. Crown American Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. G.E.M. Building Contractors & Developers Inc. v. Egidio's Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County1992
  3. Mele Construction Co. v. Crown American Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Wickes Lumber v. Hedgerow Manor, Ltd., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API