Saint v. Martel
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Action by Percy Saint against J. Sully Martel. Motion of defendant, which was dismissed, referred to the merits, and defendant moved for a new trial, which being overruled, he applied for an appeal, which was refused, and applies for writs of certiorari and mandamus and prohibition.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of the Facts.
NICHOLLS, J.
In the application made for the issuing of the writs prayed for, it is alleged that:
‘‘The judge of the Twenty-Third judicial district court of the parish of St. Mary having been recused in the above entitled and numbered cause, Hon. W. P. Martin, judge of Twentieth judicial district court, was by consent of all parties selected to try the above cause.
“That on the 22d of March, 1909, and pursuant to notice duly given, Judge Martin, the judge ad hoc in the above suit, was in court for the purpose of considering a motion to set this cause for trial. That…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Windsor v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- United States v. CarllSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Cary v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
- Oglesby v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- St. Louis Mining & Milling Co. v. Montana Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Montgomery v. BreauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- City of New Orleans v. Salmen Brick & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
- Saint v. MartelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Herrera v. Beatrice Gallegos & Usagencies Casualty InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Short v. JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.