Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Crum

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 15, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCauley, S.

The executor asks that the residuary clause of the testator’s will be construed and the question of its validity and effect determined in this proceeding so that payment of the residue of the personal estate may be decreed to be made to the residuary legatee or to the person or persons who may be adjudged legally entitled to receive the same.

The parish village of Wildenthierbach, in the kingdom of Wurtemberg, Germany, claiming to be the residuary legatee named in the will, has appeared herein by counsel and, while joining in the request, alleges that the residuary clause…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Manice v. . ManiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Tilden v. . GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Cross v. United States Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. In Re the Probate of the Will of RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Fairchild v. . Edson Edson v. . BartowNew York Court of Appeals · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of ShipmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1942
  2. In re the Accounting of Rochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API