Legal Opinion
Graziano v. Goord
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 11, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of using a controlled substance. Given that the two tests performed on *702petitioner’s urine sample yielded positive results for the presence of opiates, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the finding of drug use (see, Matter of Mercado v Selsky, 270 AD2d 550; Matter of Davis v Goord, 268 AD2d 932).…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Soto-Rodriguez v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Foust v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Davis v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Mercado v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Wright v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rivera v. PrackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Galdamez v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Montalbo v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Rivera v. PrackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012