Legal Opinion
J. L. Philips & Co. v. Barber
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided February 27, 1922No. 25030PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Certiorari from Court of Appeal, Parish of Ascension. Action by J.. L. Philips & Co., Incorporated, against Charles Barber and another. Judgment for plaintiff. The defendant Henry Pi-card brings certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Parish of Ascension, to review an adverse judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
By the WHOLE COURT.
ST. PAUL, J.
The opinion and decree herein handed down by the Court of Appeal, are as follows:
"Leche and Mouton, Judges. Plaintiffs brought a suit against Charles Barber for $842, claiming a privilege on a lot of cross-ties. They obtained at the same time a writ of sequestration under which the cross-ties were seized. During the pendency of the suit, Barber was granted an order releasing the seizure on his furnishing bond in the sum of $1,000. Barber accordingly furnished a bond with Henry Picard as surety.
“In due course, plaintiffs obtained a judgment against Barber for the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fusz & Backer v. Tracer & NobleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
- Perret v. ColemanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- D. R. Carroll & Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
- McCloskey, Bigley & Co. v. Wingfield & BridgesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marino v. MarinoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Hershell Corp. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Brown v. SerpasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Nellie Pierce v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Pierce v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014