People v. Albany & Susquehanna Railroad
New York Supreme Court
Motion to set aside the judgment in the action, and all subsequent proceedings. About 2 P. M., of December 31, 1868, Mr. Justice E. i Dabwih Smith, before whom this cause was tried without a jury, filed in the Monroe county clerk’s office his findings of facts and conclusions of law, having before that delivered an opinion (reported in 7 Abb. Pr. PT. iS., 265) on the questions involved.
Read the full summary
Motion to set aside the judgment in the action, and all subsequent proceedings. About 2 P. M., of December 31, 1868, Mr. Justice E. i Dabwih Smith, before whom this cause was tried without a jury, filed in the Monroe county clerk’s office his findings of facts and conclusions of law, having before that delivered an opinion (reported in 7 Abb. Pr. PT. iS., 265) on the questions involved. Immediately thereafter a judgment in accordance therewith was entered, by which, among other things, it was adjudged that those known as the “Ramsey board” were duly elected directors, and that they and the…
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The parties to this motion are all defendants in this action, and it will be most convenient to designate them as the Church party and the Ramsey party, respectively. The judgment which this motion seeks to have set aside was entered, and the judgment roll filed on December 31, 1869, about two o’clock in the afternoon, as appears from the papers. This judgment was in favor of the Ramsey party, and against the Church party. On the same day, and after said judgment had been entered, the counsel for the Church party residing at Rochester, where said action was tried and judgment entered, caused…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Clumpha v. WhitingNew York Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by1 opinion
- Evans v. VirginWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887