Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Lucas v. Anderson Ford

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 2004No. A-03-1079Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCarlson, Judge

I agree with the majority that the trial court erred in finding that Lucas’ accident and injuries arose out of and in the course of his employment. Therefore, I would also affirm the decision of the review panel finding that there was no evidence to support the trial court’s finding that Lucas’ fall was compensable and dismissing Lucas’ appeal.

As to the cross-appeal, High and the State contend that High, as conservator-trustee of the Trust Fund, is not a proper party to this action and that instead, the Trust Fund itself is the proper third party. High and the State argue that the review…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mabile v. Drivers Management, Inc.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API