Legal Opinion
Ross v. City of Berkeley
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 11, 1987No. C-85-7321 MHPPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PATEL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, owner and lessors of commercial rental property, bring this action against the City of Berkeley (“the City”) and their current lessees (“the lessees”) on the basis, inter alia, of the alleged unconstitutionality of the City’s Telegraph Avenue Area Commercial Rent Mediation and Arbitration Ordinance and its preceding temporary enactments. Plaintiffs claim that the ordinance unconstitutionally deprives them of possession of their premises in violation of rights secured under the Contracts Clause, the Due Process Clause, and the Takings Clause of the…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Herrington v. County of SonomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Rui One Corp. v. City of BerkeleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Electri-Tech, Inc. v. H F Campbell Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Shell v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- McDonald's Corp. v. NelsonDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.