Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Jackson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 8, 2010PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY DONOHUE, J.:

This is an appeal from an order finding that the attachment of double jeopardy prohibited the criminal prosecution of Kevin Michael Jackson (“Jackson”) for certain offenses which had previously served as the basis for a finding of indirect criminal contempt of an order granted under the Protection from Abuse Act (“PFA order”). Following our review, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

The facts underlying this appeal may be summarized as follows. On April 15, 2008, following a hearing, a PFA order was entered against Jackson. The order…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. MoserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. BrumbaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. AlstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HolstonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Commonwealth v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. FarrowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Commonwealth v. LambertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Commonwealth v. FelderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API