Legal Opinion

Indiana Utilities Co. v. Wakeham

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1918No. 9,461PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Steuben Circuit Court; Dan M. Link, Judge. Action by Sarah Wareham against the Indiana Utilities Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHottel, J.

— This is an appeal from a judgment for $1,200 rendered in favor of appellee in an action brought by her against appellant for damages alleged to have been sustained as a result of appellant’s negligence in leaving exposed and unguarded a hole which it had dug in a public highway.

Appellant assigns as error upon which it relies for reversal: (1) The overruling of its motion to require appellee to make more specific her second amended complaint; (2) the overruling of its demurrer to said complaint; (3) the overruling of its motion for a new trial.

*5451. Appellant has waived its first assigned error…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Domestic Block Coal Co. v. DeArmeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Inland Steel Co. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Tippecanoe Loan & Trust Co. v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MacyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. DeHaven v. DeHavenIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hotelling v. Fargo-Western Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Princemont Construction Corp. v. A. D. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  3. Gwaltney Drilling, Inc. v. McKeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Kirmse v. Chicago, Terre Haute & Southeastern Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Starz v. KirschIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API