Legal Opinion

Biellak v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of Perinton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 10, 1980PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Hancock, Jr., J. P.

Petitioner Biellak appeals from a judgment dismissing his CPLR article 78 proceeding brought to annul the action of the Town of Perinton Zoning Board of Appeals in granting an area variance of the 50-foot front yard set-back requirement to respondent Koenig, Mr. Biellak’s next door neighbor.

The pivotal question is whether the board’s determination that the "applicant is * * * suffering from practical difficulties” which would support an area variance "has a rational basis and is supported by substantial evidence in the record” (Conley v Town of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Conley v. Town of Brookhaven Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gianchetta v. WilensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. McLaren v. SchickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Morano v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Welch v. LawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Burkhardt v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of Putnam ValleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API