Legal Opinion
Zook v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 20, 1976PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action against an insurer, inter alia, to recover damages for its failure to satisfy a judgment obtained against its insured, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 3, 1976, which denied their motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Plaintiffs were injured on April 26, 1972 when a truck, owned by Bomac Trucking Inc., driven by Carl A. Voelker and insured by defendant, struck their vehicle. A summons and complaint was served on Bomac and Voelker in June, 1972. There is a question as to whether defendant was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Appell v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Appell v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. Beers Chevrolet Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Miranda v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Zook v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Zook v. Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Romano v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SparacioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006