United States v. Howard
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
MICHAEL, Judge:
Appellant, pursuant to his pleas, was convicted at a special court-martial of numerous violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), including 19 specifications alleging larceny in violation of Article 121, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 921. He was sentenced by members to reduction to pay grade E-l and a bad-conduct discharge. The reviewing authorities below approved the findings and sentence as awarded.
The error assigned presents the question of whether appellant’s pleas to specifications one and two of Charge IV were provident. We agree with appellant’s assertion that they…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Relford v. Commandant, US Disciplinary Barracks, Fort LeavenworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. HedlundUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. MatthewsU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. HaywardCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998