Legal Opinion

Hoag v. Boehmer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1910No. Docket No. 115Published

Error to Calhoun; North, J. Trespass guare clausum fregit by William Hoag against Hugh Boehmer and others. A judgment for defendants on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This is an action of trespass guare clausum fregit to recover for removing a certain fence in the township of Lee, Calhoun county. The defendants sought to justify under the claimed statutory authority of the defendant Stultz, a commissioner of highways, to remove the fence as an obstruction of a public highway.

The proceedings, in laying out this road, by said officer, were conceded to be regular, and that question was settled by the recent case of Page v. Boehmer, 154 Mich. 693 (118 N. W. 602). It is also conceded that the fence taken down here covered 240 rods, between lands owned by Page…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hogsett v. EllisMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Hart v. LindleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Page v. BoehmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Kellar v. EarlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API