Legal Opinion

Scholl v. Adams

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1931Published

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The complaint is subject to the principal objection directed against it, unless appellant’s claim that sec. 315.01, Stats., applies only to real estate of which deceased died seized, is sound. This section, so far as applicable to this situation, reads as follows:

“No debt of or claim against any deceased person, which was not a lien upon the real estate of such decedent before his death, shall be a lien upon or valid claim against any such real estate in this state for the payment of which such real estate can be sold by an executor or administrator after *176three years from the death of such…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fisk v. JeneweinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API