Legal Opinion

Sydor v. Harris

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 26, 1979No. 77 C 1591PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

NEAHER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in this civil action seek to recover losses allegedly sustained as a result of a burglary of their apartment on May 7, 1976. They claim under a residential crime insurance policy issued to them pursuant to Section 602(d) of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1970, P.L. 91-609, re-designated as Part C and §§ 1231-34 of the Urban Property Protection and Reinsurance Act of 1968, as amended, 12 U.S.C. §§ 1749bbb-10a et seq. Defendant refused to compensate plaintiffs, relying upon a limitation of recoverable losses to those resulting…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. American Bonding Co. of BaltimoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Offutt v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. Shattuck & Jones, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  4. United Sponging Co. v. Preferred Accident InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916
  5. Swanson, Inc. v. Central Surety & InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brinker v. GuiffridaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Baugher v. Secretary of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API