Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lopez v. Regional Transportation District

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 17, 1994No. 93CA1790Published

1Dissent

Judge ROY

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent.

As Judge Julius Bissell once observed,

The algebraic representation of the unknown quantity, %’ probably well expresses the value and usefulness of a dissenting opinion in judicial proceedings. The universality of the custom, coupled with the importance of the present inquiry, has led to the labor, and the possible incumbrance of the Reports with this opinion.

Hockaday v. Board of County Commissioners, 1 Colo.App. 362, 381, 29 P. 287, 293 (1892).

*258The majority has held that the notice required by § 24-10-109(3), C.R.S. (1988 Repl.Vol. 10A) is effective…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Trinity Broadcasting of Denver, Inc. v. City of WestminsterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. Woodsmall v. Regional Transportation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. Hockaday v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Lafitte v. State Highway Department of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API