Lovett v. Sandersville Railroad Company
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Grice, Justice.
Counsel for the defendant in error argue that in the passage of the act approved August 18, 1924 (Ga. L. 1924, p. 75), the legislature has invaded the province of the judicial department, and that any effort on the part of the lawmakers to bind courts as to the amount of time the latter shall allow for argument is futile and void, because it infringes upon the exercise by the courts of those functions which the constitution commits to them. This is but another way of arguing that the statute is unconstitutional. Whether it is or not, however, is not a matter now before us.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bradley v. State ex rel. Solicitor-GeneralSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Devereux v. Atlanta Railway & Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Chapman v. GraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1850
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. AlfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Brown v. HutchesonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Alston & Bird LLP v. Mellon Ventures II, L.P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Judicial Council of Ga. v. BROWN & GALLOSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- Lovett v. Sandersville Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.