Legal Opinion
Cassidy & Pinkard, Inc. v. Jemal
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 31, 1995No. Civ. A. 93-2668 (JR)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ROBERTSON, District Judge.
This is an action by a real estate brokerage firm to recover a commission in connection with the sale of Wonder Plaza, a property located at 2301 Georgia Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C., to Howard University on August 30,1993. Plaintiff advances four theories of recovery: breach of contract, quantum meruit, fraudulent misrepresentation, and promissory estoppel. Now before the Court is defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment as to the second and third of those claims, for quantum meruit and fraudulent misrepresentation.
The following facts are…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dell v. Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Soper v. Simmons International Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Vereen v. ClayborneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Truitt v. MillerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kwang Dong Pharmaceutical Co. v. Myun Ki HanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Fred Ezra Co. v. PedasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- UHAR & COMPANY, INC. v. JacobDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- In Re Capitol Hill GroupDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Schaffer v. Timberland C o .District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.