Legal Opinion

(PC) Smith v. Santoro

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 1, 2022No. 1:21-cv-01329Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY J. SMITH, ) Case No. 1:21-cv-01329-JLT-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 13 v. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF THE ACTION 14 K. SANTORO, et al., ) ) (ECF No. 20) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) ) 17 18 Plaintiff Anthony J. Smith is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 19 § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 20

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff filed the instant action on November 8, 2021. 21 I. 22…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API