Duncan v. Boyd

On Motions for Rehearing.

Both appellants and appellees filed motions for rehearing. Our opinion is attacked by appellees’ motion as misconstruing the first, second, and fourth orders of the court, and for dissolving the injunctive relief granted by them for the same reasons contended for in their original brief. But as to these matters we adhere to our former construction of the orders.

We held that the injunctive relief granted by the third order with reference to the 100-acre irrigated field was authorized under appellees’ allegations that Lee’s contract of November 25, 1925, and deeds of…