Legal Opinion

Bain v. Cormack Enterprises, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 9, 1999No. 82,200PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Davis, J.:

Cormack Enterprises, Inc., (Cormack) appeals from the Workers Compensation Board (Board) ruling that its employee, Loyola F. Bain, gave notice of her work-related accident within the 10 days required by K.S.A. 44-520. Cormack argues that K.A.R. 51-17-1 applies, making Bain’s notice 2 days late. However, we conclude that the Board correctly applied K.S.A. 60-206(a) in computing the 10-day period and affirm.

The case was transferred to this court pursuant to K.S.A. 20-3018(c). All parties agree that Bain meets all the statutory requirements for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. State v. Cheun-Phon JiSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  4. Ruddick v. Boeing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  5. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blue v. TosCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
  2. City of Derby v. HaskinsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000
  3. Sander v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API