Legal Opinion

Leeds Lodge No. 446, A. F. & A. M. v. Whitmire

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 8, 1938No. 6 Div. 387PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

The respondent was sued and described by the name in which it executed the mortgage or deed of trust and the bill was not subject to the demurrer for failure of further description, that is, whether corporation, partnership or unincorporated association. Union Ins. Soc. of Canton, Limited, v. Sudduth, 212 Ala. 649, 103 So. 845.

The case of Shepherd v. Birmingham Trust & Savings Co., 233 Ala. 320, 171 So. 906, is not in conflict as it was dealing with the necessity for describing the plaintiff and not the defendant and the opinion in the Sudduth Case, supra, expressly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Union Ins. Soc. of Canton v. SudduthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Shepherd v. Birmingham Trust & Savings Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chero-Cola Bottling Co., Etc. v. WatfordAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API