Legal Opinion

Hanlon v. Union Pacific Railway Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1894No. 4594PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from the district court of Dodge county. Tried below before Marshall, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

The plaintiffs in error, who were also plaintiffs in the district court, alleged that they were the heirs and widow of Patrick Hanlou, deceased; that on March 18, 1878, Patrick Hanlon became the owner of two tracts of land described in the petition by courses and distances, both tracts being in the city of Fremont; that Patrick Hanlon died seized of said land July 1, 1881; that in March, *541879, and at divers other times between that date and the beginning of the action, the defendant “without right or authority, wrongfully and unlawfully, and with force entered upon said premises…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lowe v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Myers v. McGavockNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Graham v. HartnettNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Tomer v. DensmoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. ShepherdNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nebraska Power Co. v. KoenigNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  2. American Building & Loan Ass'n v. RainboltNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. City of Chadron v. GloverNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Ohm v. Clear Creek Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Nelson v. JenkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API