Legal Opinion

Prigden v. Duer

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 15, 1870Published

Bill of Exceptions. From Muscogee.

1Opinion of the Court

(Atlanta,

BIEL OF EXCEPTIONS—EVIDENCE MUST BE INCORPORATED OR ATTACHED—IDENTIFICATION BY SIGNATURE OF JUDGE.*—'Rule tenth requires a brief of the oral and a copy of the written testimony in the case shall be incorporated in the bill of exceptions, or be attached thereto, as an exhibit; and, in the latter case, it shall be identified as true by the signature of the Judge thereupon, and for failure to comply with this rule the bill of exceptions will be dismissed. (R.)

Pridgen held a judgment against one Martin, and garnisheed “John W. Duer, Ordinary of !said county, claiming in his affidavit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lee v. PorterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  2. Colquitt v. SolomonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  3. Parker v. DowdySupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  4. Pounds v. HansonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API