Legal Opinion

Van Cleef v. Tierney

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 14, 1941No. 4408PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGaRRett, Presiding Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority to the party Tierney in an interference proceeding instituted between a patent to Van Cleef and an application ■of Tierney, the subject matter being broadly described as adhesive tape.

Four counts are involved, all being for the article.

As the issue is presented here it is sufficient to quote counts 1 and 3 for illustrative purposes:

Count 1. As a new article of manufacture, a tape comprising a strip of rubber hydrohalide and a coating…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  2. Field v. Knowles. Field v. KnowlesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  3. Arthur W. Schnick v. Lawrence E. FennCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  4. Application of William C. AnthonyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  5. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. Van CleefCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API