Legal Opinion

Wieners v. Doe

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 2005No. Nos. 26481, 26484, 26486PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES K PREWITT, Judge.

Director of Revenue (“Director”) seeks to appeal from three judgments in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants denominated as “John Doe.” Darold Wieners (“Respondent Wieners”) and Chris Adam-son (“Respondent Adamson”) have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, asserting that Director has no standing to appeal. We agree that the appeals must be dismissed, but we base it on grounds other than those urged in the motion and do not reach the grounds stated by plaintiffs.

It is this court’s duty to ascertain whether it has jurisdiction of the case even if not raised by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Proctor v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Jines v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. F.W. Disposal South, LLC v. St. Louis County CouncilMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Jean-Robert Nast by and through his guardian Jan Freeman, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Gateway Ambulance Service, LLC, Defendants/Respondents. Certain Underwriters at LLoyd's London, Proposed Intervenor/Appellant.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Leslie M. Henson, Individually, and As Personal Representative of the Estate of Leslie S. Henson v. Merob Logistics, LLC, and Tedros S. Lakew, and Zurich American Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. Mila Homes, LLC v. Donald H. Scott and Carolyn ScottMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API