Legal Opinion

Dibenedetto v. Miller

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 2008No. Nos. C-080325 and C-080402PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mark P. Painter, Judge.

{¶ 1} Richard DiBenedetto sued Charles Miller and Keating Muething & Klekamp, P.L.L. (“KMK”), for legal malpractice. Because there was never a lawyer-client relationship, and because the case was time-barred in any event, the trial court dismissed the case under Civ.R. 12(B)(6). The trial court was correct on both issues, so we affirm.

I. The Original Transaction

{¶ 2} DiBenedetto bought a yacht. FirstMerit Bank financed the purchase. After a default, FirstMerit repossessed the yacht, but it later sold the yacht back to DiBenedetto with a new promissory note. Summer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State ex rel. Cooker Restaurant Corp. v. Montgomery County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Fant v. SykesOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Lambert v. HartmannOhio Court of Appeals · 2008

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Evans v. Quest DiagnosticsOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Feagan v. Bethesda N. Hosp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. Cooper v. Commercial Sav. BankOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API