Dibenedetto v. Miller
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Mark P. Painter, Judge.
{¶ 1} Richard DiBenedetto sued Charles Miller and Keating Muething & Klekamp, P.L.L. (“KMK”), for legal malpractice. Because there was never a lawyer-client relationship, and because the case was time-barred in any event, the trial court dismissed the case under Civ.R. 12(B)(6). The trial court was correct on both issues, so we affirm.
I. The Original Transaction
{¶ 2} DiBenedetto bought a yacht. FirstMerit Bank financed the purchase. After a default, FirstMerit repossessed the yacht, but it later sold the yacht back to DiBenedetto with a new promissory note. Summer…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State ex rel. Cooker Restaurant Corp. v. Montgomery County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Fant v. SykesOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Lambert v. HartmannOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
3Cited by3 opinions
- Evans v. Quest DiagnosticsOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Feagan v. Bethesda N. Hosp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
- Cooper v. Commercial Sav. BankOhio Court of Appeals · 2015