Legal Opinion

Hale v. Grigsby

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Minnehaha county. Hon. J. "W. Jones, Judge. Action by Amelia Hale against Melvin Grigsby and another, to set aside certain instruments relating to real property. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, P. J.

This is an action by the plaintiff against Melvin Grigsby to cancel and set aside certain instruments which cast a cloud upon her title to certain lands owned by her in Minnehaha and McCook counties, and also against Porter P. Peck, as receiver, appointed in certain actions wherein Grigsby was plaintiff and one Day was the defendant. Findings and judgment were in favor of the plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

On the trial the defendants objected to any evidence being admitted on the part of the plaintiff, on the ground .that her complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roblin v. PalmerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Brace v. Van EpsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Bateman v. BackusSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1887
  4. Van Dyke v. GrigsbySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Buckham v. HooverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Directors of Infirmary v. MerkleMuskingum County Court of Common Pleas · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API