Legal Opinion

Patouillet v. Patouillet

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 1831PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ATPEAL FROM THE COURT OF PROBATES FOR THE PARISH AND CITY OF NEW-ORLEANS. This suit was brought by the son, to recover from his mother and natural tutrix, the share accruing to him from the succession of his father, which was opened in the parish of Orleans. The defendant excepted to the jurisdiction of the. court, on the ground that she was a resident of the parish of Jefferson. The court overruled the exception.

Read the full summary

ATPEAL FROM THE COURT OF PROBATES FOR THE PARISH AND CITY OF NEW-ORLEANS. This suit was brought by the son, to recover from his mother and natural tutrix, the share accruing to him from the succession of his father, which was opened in the parish of Orleans. The defendant excepted to the jurisdiction of the. court, on the ground that she was a resident of the parish of Jefferson. The court overruled the exception. There was judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtMathews, J.

In this case the plaintiff claims from his mother, the portion of his father's estate which fell to his share, and was administered by her, as his tutrix by nature, and he obtained judgment in the court below, from which she appealed.

An objection was made to the jurisdiction of the Probate Court of the parish and city of New-Orleans, on account of an alleged division of the parish, which placed the defendant in the parish of Jefferson. It does not appear that on the division, any requisition was made by law, for the removal of records to the new parish. The court in which this suit was…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Buillard v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  2. Grevemberg v. BradfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1892
  3. Beale v. WaldenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1845
  4. Vuillemot v. GonsulinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API