Legal Opinion

Lothrop v. Conely

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1878PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Motion for writ of prohibition.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

After the appointment of a general administrator commissioners were appointed to hear claims against the estate, and had given notices and entered on their duties. Afterwards an appeal was taken from the appointment of administrator and pending the- appeal a special administrator was appointed. The commissioners continued to act, and a motion is made for a prohibition, the facts being admitted.

Per Curiam. The appeal from the appointment of the administrator did not carry up with it any of the collateral proceedings and only stayed further proceedings in pursuance of the order appealed from.…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Patrick v. HowardMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. In Re Critchell EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. McNamara v. Michigan Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Goodrich v. Hubbard's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Goodrich v. Hubbard's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API