Moore v. Dickson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Vernon county: J. J. Feuit, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal by forty of the defendants from judgment in favor of the plaintiff, rendered upon a second trial of the same action considered in Moore v. May, llY Wis. 192, 94 N. W. 45, where the facts are quite fully stated.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Vernon county: J. J. Feuit, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal by forty of the defendants from judgment in favor of the plaintiff, rendered upon a second trial of the same action considered in Moore v. May, llY Wis. 192, 94 N. W. 45, where the facts are quite fully stated. Upon the second trial the court, by unexcepted instructions, submitted to the jury the question whether the persons whose signatures appear either upon the sheets of paper or the pages of the book actually subscribed their names to the articles of copartnership knowing they were…
1Opinion of the CourtDodge, J.
1. The only question raised on the merits is whether ei’ror was committed in refusing to direct a verdict in favor of the appealing defendants and in refusing to set aside that l’endered in favor of the plaintiff. This -depends, of coui’se, on whether there was any credible evidence tending to establish, as to each of the appellants separately, that he affixed his signature with the understanding and intent to subsci’ibe the articles of copartnership, which, it is claimed, *593were mechanically attached either to the sheets of paper or to the hook at the several times of signing. A typical…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Cobb v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Bloom v. KruegerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Hagen v. BowersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Harmon v. National Supply Co. of KansasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Mendonca v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.