Legal Opinion

People v. Sendel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 26, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It is well established that when a defendant makes a timely application to withdraw a plea of guilty, "the court should, except under special circumstances, either grant the application or else make reasonable inquiry to determine whether the application has merit (see, People v Frederick, 45 NY2d *727520; People v Rodriquez, 90 AD2d 489)” (People v Jenkins, 90 AD2d 854). Only in rare instances will an evidentiary hearing be required (see, People v Tinsley, 35 NY2d 926). In the case at bar, the defendant made a motion at sentencing to withdraw his guilty plea. The sentencing court denied the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. FrederickNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. TinsleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. JenkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. People v. RodriquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. MachadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. People v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. People v. HoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. People v. SendelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API