Legal Opinion · Dissent

Colgan v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 10, 1989No. 3044 C.D. 1988Published

1DissentBarry, Judge

I must agree with the majority’s statement that when a licensee requests that a test other than the one offered by *482the arresting officer be administered a refusal has occurred. However, I do not believe that this is the decisive fact in this case and I therefore respectively dissent.

As noted by the majority, the licensee, following a refusal to submit to a breathalyzer test agreed to submit to a blood test. Upon arrival at a local hospital a physician began to prepare to administer the blood test. The licensee protested the withdrawal of blood from his arm and requested that it be extracted…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Marmo v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API