Legal Opinion

Sandhu v. Sandhu

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

There was no error of law in the conclusion reached by both courts below that cruel and inhuman treatment has been sufficiently demonstrated to satisfy the requirement of subdivision (1) of section 170 of the Domestic Relations Law (Hessen v Hessen, 33 NY2d 406, 411). In balancing the several factors to be considered on this record, the courts were not bound to deny relief to plaintiff husband because of the duration of the marriage and defendant wife’s lack of demonstrated ability to support…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hessen v. HessenNew York Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Spinelli v. SpinelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Melnick v. MelnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. DeBlasio v. DeBlasioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Melnick v. MelnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API