Legal Opinion

Baltzly v. Sandoro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 7, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The IAS Court properly granted summary judgment to defendant. Plaintiff alleges that defendant fraudulently induced her to sign an agreement for the restoration of her automobile by misrepresenting the cost of the work as $15,000, which "could vary ten to fifteen per cent (10-15%) either way.” The contract explicitly provides, however, that the cost of the restoration would be "minimum $15,000.” "Since the written instrument contains terms different from those allegedly orally represented, and [plaintiff] is presumed to have read the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Jaybert Esso Service Station, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  2. Corporate Graphics, Inc. v. Mehlman Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Lewin Chevrolet-Geo-Oldsmobile, Inc. v. BenderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. In Re the Arbitration Between Gerber Homes & Additions, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API