Legal Opinion · Dissent

McHugh v. McHugh

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1988No. 16703Published

1DissentBakes, Justice

The majority opinion is premised, I believe, on the assumption that if the Idaho district court had jurisdiction over Mr. McHugh sufficient to satisfy the due process clause of the United States Constitution, that it also had jurisdiction over his retirement benefits under the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), 10 U.S.C. § 1408. However, a careful review of that Act will demonstrate that that assumption is incorrect.

The USFSPA limits the jurisdiction to divide military retirement pay to the state of the serviceman’s residence or his domicile (unless he consents to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Duthie v. Lewiston Gun ClubIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Austin v. Fulton Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. McQuillen v. City of AmmonIdaho Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API