Legal Opinion

Rolling Plains Groundwater Conservation District v. City of Aspermont

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 2011No. 08-0591PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

Rolling Plains Groundwater Conservation District sued the City of Aspermont for water transportation fees and for a declaration that the City must comply with the District’s rules. The court of appeals held that governmental immunity barred the District’s claim for payment but not its declaratory judgment action. 258 S.W.3d 231, 236. While this appeal was pending, we decided City of El Paso v. Heinrich, 284 S.W.3d 366, 368-69 (Tex.2009), which is consistent with the court of appeals’ ultimate holding with respect to the District’s claim for past due fees, penalties, and costs. Consequently,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. The City of El Paso v. Lilli M. HeinrichTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Wichita Falls State Hospital v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. City of Houston v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  5. City of Midlothian v. Black, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. in Re Sustainable Texas Oyster Resource Management, L.L.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Brennan v. City of Willow ParkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  3. the City of Sugar Land v. Leon Kaplan, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  4. Jefferson County v. StinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. v. EmmettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2013

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API