United States v. Billy Joe Entrekin
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a denial of a. motion for reduction of sentence. The thrust of the defendant Entrekin’s contentions is that his sentence was imposed illegally. We have reviewed Entrekin’s arguments and find them without merit. We affirm the decision of the district court. Statement of the Case
The defendant Entrekin was convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 371, three counts of mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 1342, and one count of making false declarations before a grand jury, 18 U.S.C. § 1623. The maximum term of imprisonment for each count was five…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Jack MekjianCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- William E. Gaddis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- John Culberson Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Michael H. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Jules W. WertheimerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Richard MartensonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1996
- George C. Norris v. O.H. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Burnett v. KindtDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1984
- United States v. FortnerDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.