Jones v. Abraham
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
The question at issue here must be resolved by an interpretation of the option to lease along with its various amendments. It is well settled that unambiguous contracts are for the court to construe and a motion for summary judgment is a proper method of invoking the court’s determination. General Gas Corp. v. Carn, 103 Ga. App. 542 (120 SE2d 156). In the trial court, both parties took the position that the agreements comprising the total contract were unambiguous and both requested a summary judgment in their favor. Now plaintiff insists that there were various ambiguities…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Scales v. PeevyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- General Gas Corporation v. CarnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- PLANTERS RURAL TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. v. ChanceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Studstill v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- King v. FryerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
3Cited by3 opinions
- Plantation Pipe Line Co. v. 3-D Excavators, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Roe v. DoeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Sawtell Partners, LLC v. Visy Recycling, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006