Legal Opinion

Kaltenberger v. Alexander Hotel Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 9, 1932No. Docket No. 7103PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, P. J.

One of the provisions of rule VIII of the rules of this court reads: “The briefs must present each point separately, under an appropriate heading, showing the nature of the question to be presented.” We interpret the latter clause of this portion of the rule to refer to legal questions, for our courts of review deal only, on appeal, with questions of that nature.

There is not one heading in the opening brief of appellant in the present case—and there is no reply brief—which states any “question to be presented on the appeal”. A small portion of the brief is headed, “Statement of Facts”, and…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cunnyngham v. Mason-Mcduffie Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Milano v. BulleriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Herlihy v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Currier v. Oakland AssociationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API