Legal Opinion

State v. Venable

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1989No. 88-394PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fuhrman, D.J.

Robert R. Venable, convicted by a jury of robbery, was sentenced to serve a term of 16 V3 to 50 years. Venable appeals, claiming the court erred in failing to grant a mistrial because the prosecution used a peremptory challenge to strike one of the only two black prospective jurors and in allowing the prosecutor to ask his rebuttal witness if she had been convicted of a felony. We affirm.

After the voir dire of the jury, the prosecution used a peremptory challenge to dismiss Calvin Brye as a prospective juror. Defense counsel moved for a mistrial based on the prosecution’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Strauder v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. State v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. RoweNebraska Supreme Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. BronsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. GarzaNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. PrattNebraska Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API