In Re Miller's Estate
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClaek, J.
Frank F. Miller and Kate A. Miller, cousins of the first degree, residents of Berrien county, in 1904 determined to marry. The statutes of this State were thought to present an obstacle. They went to. Kentucky, where there was no prohibition against the marriage of first cousins, were married in the manner prescribed by the laws of that State, and at once returned to their home. From the marriage until the husband’s death in 1926, they lived together as husband and wife. No children were born. After the husband’s death the widow sought administration of his estate. A contest by collateral…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Van Voorhis v. . BrintnallNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Commonwealth v. LaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Inhabitants of Medway v. Inhabitants of NeedhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
- Harrison v. State ex rel. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864
- Thorp v. . ThorpNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Loughran v. LoughranSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- In Re the Estate of LoughmillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
- In Re Toth EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- BALODISBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1980