Legal Opinion

McIntyre v. Byrne

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 21, 1958No. [No. 233, September Term, 1957.]PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.

The first matter to be disposed of in this appeal is the appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal. This motion is based upon alleged violations of Maryland Rule 828 by the appellant. As we have decided to overrule the motion, we shall not consider it in detail; but, we shall say that the motion presents a very close question for our decision. The Rule is clear, definite and certain; there is little excuse for having an attorney’s compliance therewith questioned, much less to have it closely challenged. The substantial rights of litigants to have judgments and decrees reviewed upon appeal…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kemp-Pontiac-Cadillac, Inc. v. S & M CONSTR. CO., INC.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Boyd v. BoydCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Federal Armored Express, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. Lee v. Estate of DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  5. Estate of Posner v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API