City of Phila. v. Subin Subin
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Porter, J.,
This is an action of scire facias sur municipal claim for paving a sidewialk. The defendants challenged the right of plaintiff to recover upon the following grounds; (1) That no notice had been served by the city authorities upon the owners to do the work; and (2) That the notice alleged by the plaintiff to have been served was not in such form as to authorize a recovery for the work which was done.
The claim filed averred that notice had been served. The averments of the claim were prima facie evidence of the facts therein stated. The affidavit of defense admitted that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Pittsburgh v. MacConnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Philadelphia v. PetersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
3Cited by4 opinions
- Philadelphia ex rel. DePaul v. Philadelphia Authority for Industrial DevelopmentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Philadelphia, to Use v. BlackSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- City of Phila. to Use v. RobisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- City of Philadelphia v. Solo, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1954