Legal Opinion

Gilham v. Gilham

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 4, 1984No. 01387PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

Appellant, the former wife of appellee, seeks the enforcement in a Pennsylvania court of an “alimony” award granted to her in Ohio in 1978. The lower court declined to implement the enforcement procedures of the Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (RURESA) 1 because Mr. and Mrs. Gilham were divorced by decree of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County in 1979. We affirm. 2

Prior to their divorce Mr. and Mrs. Gilham apparently lived in Ohio where Mrs. Gilham continues to reside. In March of 1978 the Court of Common Pleas of Belmont County, Ohio issued an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. WolfeOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Stambaugh v. StambaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Werline v. WerlineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cohen v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Tihansky v. Tihansky, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API