Legal Opinion

In re Horicon Drainage District

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Dodge county: James J. Dick, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from an order of the circuit.court for Dodge county in a proceeding to establish a drainage district under secs. 1379 — 11 to 1379 — 31, Stats. 1898, and acts, amendatory thereof and supplementary thereto. The petition was signed by a corporation known as the Rock River Valley Lumber Company and others.

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Dodge county: James J. Dick, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from an order of the circuit.court for Dodge county in a proceeding to establish a drainage district under secs. 1379 — 11 to 1379 — 31, Stats. 1898, and acts, amendatory thereof and supplementary thereto. The petition was signed by a corporation known as the Rock River Valley Lumber Company and others. It alleges, in substance, that the proposed district extends from the northern line of Dodge county southerly through Horicon marsh, the city of Horicon, and beyond the village of…

1Opinion of the CourtKeewist, J.

It is contended on the part of the respond•ents that the order is not appealable, and, if this position is tenable, no other question presented need be considered. The decision of the court appointing commissioners having been made on the 9th day of June, 1905, and before ch. 419, Laws of 1905, went into effect, the latter law has no application, *45and the appealability of the order must be determined by the-law as it existed at the time the court made its decision. The fact that the order was entered on June 27 th, five days after ch. 419 went into effect, is of no consequence, since the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stone v. Little Yellow Drainage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Bryant v. RobbinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  3. In re Theresa Drainage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Kingston v. KingstonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Maynard v. Town of GreenfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Appeal of RottenbergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Cash v. KruschkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  3. In re Dancy Drainage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Sioux Land Co. v. EwingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  5. In re Dancy Drainage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API